What is the easiest way to check npm package vulnerabilities in a CI/CD pipeline without adding third party paid tools that require a subscription
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
What is the easiest way to check npm package vulnerabilities in a CI/CD pipeline without adding third party paid tools that require a subscription
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (2)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 2 of 2 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
official npm documentation npm audit audit-level CI exit code package-lock npm ci Google ↗
GitHub Actions official documentation Node.js npm audit CI workflow Google ↗
- cli/docs/lib/content/commands/npm-ci.md at latest · npm/cli · github.com
- npm-audit · docs.npmjs.com
- npm audit documentation · docs.npmjs.com
- GitHub Dependabot · docs.github.com
- OSV-Scanner · google.github.io
- Socket · socket.dev
Queries
2 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
official npm documentation npm audit audit-level CI exit code package-lock npm ci OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
GitHub Actions official documentation Node.js npm audit CI workflow OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Other / navigational | — | — | 1x of 1 |