Analyze whether AIA post grant review provides a higher invalidation success rate than ex parte reexamination for software architecture patents held by notorious non practicing entities.
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
Analyze whether AIA post grant review provides a higher invalidation success rate than ex parte reexamination for software architecture patents held by notorious non practicing entities.
4 real searches · 1 real-search pass
USPTO AIA trial statistics PGR final written decision claims unpatentable institution rates 2025Google ↗
OBSERVEDConsequence
USPTO ex parte reexamination statistics claims cancelled confirmed 2024 statisticsGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDReason
PGR eligibility patents effective filing date March 16 2013 nine months grounds 35 USC 321 325Google ↗
OBSERVEDOther / navigational
ex parte reexamination standard substantial new question patentability clear convincing burden PGR preponderance evidenceGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDReason
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (4)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 4 of 4 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT4 real searches · gpt-6
USPTO AIA trial statistics PGR final written decision claims unpatentable institution rates 2025 Google ↗
USPTO ex parte reexamination statistics claims cancelled confirmed 2024 statistics Google ↗
PGR eligibility patents effective filing date March 16 2013 nine months grounds 35 USC 321 325 Google ↗
ex parte reexamination standard substantial new question patentability clear convincing burden PGR preponderance evidence Google ↗
- A Data-Based Look at Ex Parte Reexaminations · americanbar.org
- 35 U.S. Code § 321 - Post-grant review | U.S. Code | US Law · law.cornell.edu
- U.S.C. Title 35 · govinfo.gov
- Trial Statistics Trends at the PTAB: 2025 Edition · ptablaw.com
- Trial statistics archive · uspto.gov
- PTAB Trial Statistics - October 2024 · uspto.gov
Queries
4 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USPTO AIA trial statistics PGR final written decision claims unpatentable institution rates 2025 OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Consequence | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
USPTO ex parte reexamination statistics claims cancelled confirmed 2024 statistics OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
PGR eligibility patents effective filing date March 16 2013 nine months grounds 35 USC 321 325 OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Other / navigational | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
ex parte reexamination standard substantial new question patentability clear convincing burden PGR preponderance evidence OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 |