What is the recommended workflow to set up automated security scanning in a Bitbucket CI/CD pipeline for our Python microservices?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
What is the recommended workflow to set up automated security scanning in a Bitbucket CI/CD pipeline for our Python microservices?
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (2)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 2 of 2 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
Atlassian Bitbucket Pipelines security scanning configuration official docs pipes code insights 2026 Google ↗
Python security scanning CI Bandit pip-audit Semgrep official documentation GitHub Google ↗
- Documentation · bandit.readthedocs.io
- Documentation · semgrep.dev
- Documentation · pypi.org
- Repository · github.com
- Documentation · trivy.dev
- Documentation · checkov.io
- Code insights | Bitbucket Cloud · support.atlassian.com
- Secure your workflow with Bitbucket · atlassian.com
Queries
2 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atlassian Bitbucket Pipelines security scanning configuration official docs pipes code insights 2026 OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
Python security scanning CI Bandit pip-audit Semgrep official documentation GitHub OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Other / navigational | — | — | 1x of 1 |