What are the precise limitations of attorney-client privilege when utilizing third-party forensic IT consultants during a corporate internal investigation?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
What are the precise limitations of attorney-client privilege when utilizing third-party forensic IT consultants during a corporate internal investigation?
3 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Kovel doctrine third party consultant attorney client privilege forensic IT consultant corporate internal investigation casesGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDReason
United States v Deloitte attorney client privilege third party consultant work product Kovel Upjohn internal investigationGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDReason
Federal Rule Civil Procedure 26(b)(3) consultant work product anticipation litigation attorney consultantGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDConsequence
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (3)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 3 of 3 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT3 real searches · gpt-6
Kovel doctrine third party consultant attorney client privilege forensic IT consultant corporate internal investigation cases Google ↗
United States v Deloitte attorney client privilege third party consultant work product Kovel Upjohn internal investigation Google ↗
Federal Rule Civil Procedure 26(b)(3) consultant work product anticipation litigation attorney consultant Google ↗
- Privilege, Work Product, and Kovel: An Update from Recent Case Law · americanbar.org
- Attorney-Client Privilege & Interactions with Third-Party Consultants · americanbar.org
- Wengui v. Clark Hill—Lessons Learned to Protect Privilege in the Investigation of a Cyber Breach · americanbar.org
- The ‘Art’ of Investigating · wilmerhale.com
- Rule 26. Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery | Federal Rules of Civil Procedure | US Law · law.cornell.edu
- attorney work product privilege | Wex | US Law · law.cornell.edu
- When the Last Thing You Need Is Another Headache: Auditors in Internal Investigations · americanbar.org
- | Threats to Privilege Strategies for Mitigating the Privilege Risks Associated with Disclosures to Common Third Parties · bakerbotts.com
- Privilege in Peril: Protecting the Privilege in Corporate and Government Investigations · news.bloomberglaw.com
- Case 2:19-cv-03565-HB Document 276 Filed 03/27/23 Page 3 of 17 · govinfo.gov
- NOT PRECEDENTIAL · www2.ca3.uscourts.gov
- IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT · cases.justia.com
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation.appeal of United States of America, 599 F.2d 1224 (3d Cir. 1979) :: Justia · law.justia.com
- Case 2:16-cv-00746-MRH Document 161 Filed 02/11/19 Page 1 of 4 · govinfo.gov
Queries
3 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kovel doctrine third party consultant attorney client privilege forensic IT consultant corporate internal investigation cases OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
United States v Deloitte attorney client privilege third party consultant work product Kovel Upjohn internal investigation OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
Federal Rule Civil Procedure 26(b)(3) consultant work product anticipation litigation attorney consultant OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Consequence | — | — | 1x of 1 |