Why do insurance adjusters heavily scrutinize social media activity during Progressive bodily injury claims and how can overbroad discovery requests be quashed?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
Why do insurance adjusters heavily scrutinize social media activity during Progressive bodily injury claims and how can overbroad discovery requests be quashed?
3 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Texas rules civil procedure social media discovery personal injury overbroad discovery protective order Rule 192.4 192.6Google ↗
OBSERVEDReason
Texas court social media discovery personal injury Facebook posts scope relevance privacy motion to quash subpoenaGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDReason
Texas Rules Civil Procedure Rule 192.3 192.4 192.6 176.6 officialGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDReason
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (3)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 3 of 3 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT3 real searches · gpt-6
Texas rules civil procedure social media discovery personal injury overbroad discovery protective order Rule 192.4 192.6 Google ↗
Texas court social media discovery personal injury Facebook posts scope relevance privacy motion to quash subpoena Google ↗
Texas Rules Civil Procedure Rule 192.3 192.4 192.6 176.6 official Google ↗
- (i) **Potential parties.** A party may obtain discovery of the name, address, and telephone number of any potential party. · txcourts.gov
- TJB | Rules & Forms · txcourts.gov
- In Re Indeco Sales, Inc. and Jerome J. Wright Jr. Appeal from 253rd District Court of Liberty County :: 2014 :: Texas Ninth Court of Appeals Decisions :: Texas Case Law :: Texas Law :: U.S. Law :: Justia · law.justia.com
- In re Indeco Sales, Inc., No. 09-14-00405-CV, 2014 WL 5490943 (Tex. App. Oct. 30, 2014) · ediscoverylaw.com
- TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE · txcourts.gov
- 192.6. Protective Orders | Statutes · content.next.westlaw.com
- 192.6(b)--before the time specified for compliance--either in the court in which the action is pending or in a district court in the county where the subpoena was served. The person must serve the motion on all parties in accordance with Rule 21a. A person need not comply with the part of a subpoena from which protection is sought under this paragraph unless ordered to do so by the court. The party requesting the subpoena may seek such an order at any time after the motion for protection is file · txcourts.gov
- TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE · txcourts.gov
- State Bar of Texas | Articles · texasbar.com
- State Bar of Texas | Articles · texasbar.com
Queries
3 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Texas rules civil procedure social media discovery personal injury overbroad discovery protective order Rule 192.4 192.6 OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
Texas court social media discovery personal injury Facebook posts scope relevance privacy motion to quash subpoena OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
Texas Rules Civil Procedure Rule 192.3 192.4 192.6 176.6 official OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 |