What constitutes business defamation versus protected consumer opinion when a disgruntled former employee posts negative reviews on our corporate profile today?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
What constitutes business defamation versus protected consumer opinion when a disgruntled former employee posts negative reviews on our corporate profile today?
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (2)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 2 of 2 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
United States business defamation online reviews opinion fact former employee legal standard New York 2026 Google ↗
New York Court of Appeals defamation opinion fact online reviews anti-SLAPP statute official Google ↗
- Ruiz v Armstrong (2024 NY Slip Op 24054) · nycourts.gov
- Davis v. Boeheim :: 2014 :: New York Court of Appeals Decisions :: New York Case Law :: New York Law :: U.S. Law :: Justia · law.justia.com
- Aristocrat Plastic Surgery P.C. v Silva (2022 NY Slip Op 03311) · nycourts.gov
- Lichter v Leifer · nycourts.gov
- Dadekian v Laveway (2024 NY Slip Op 24096) · nycourts.gov
Queries
2 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
United States business defamation online reviews opinion fact former employee legal standard New York 2026 OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Other / navigational | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
New York Court of Appeals defamation opinion fact online reviews anti-SLAPP statute official OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 |