Real ChatGPT answer · index seedtcOsU7kOZH8completeCareers and HR · interviewscomparison

How does the scope of a geographical non-compete clause differ from a customer non-solicitation agreement in the tech sector?

ChatGPTgpt-62 queries11/1/2026
Download run

Fan-out diagram

The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.

SEED QUERY
How does the scope of a geographical non-compete clause differ from a customer non-solicitation agreement in the tech sector?
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Florida Statutes 542.335 restrictive covenants noncompete customer nonsolicitation text 2026Google ↗
OBSERVEDReason
Florida non solicitation customers employee restrictive covenant geographic scope statute 542.335 case lawGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDReason

Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.

Query classes

Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.

ChatGPT real searches (2)
Short factOther / navigationalComparisonConsequenceReason100%DefinitionInstructionYes / no

Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 2 of 2 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.

Searches and sources

ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
Florida Statutes 542.335 restrictive covenants noncompete customer nonsolicitation text 2026 Google ↗
Florida non solicitation customers employee restrictive covenant geographic scope statute 542.335 case law Google ↗

Queries

2 queries · click a column to sort
Query / typeSearchIntentQuery classRouting formatClusterFreq ↓Weight
Florida Statutes 542.335 restrictive covenants noncompete customer nonsolicitation text 2026
OBSERVED
Google ↗
AI Mode ↗
—Reason——1x
of 1
Florida non solicitation customers employee restrictive covenant geographic scope statute 542.335 case law
OBSERVED
Google ↗
AI Mode ↗
—Reason——1x
of 1