Compare the Avvo lawyer rating system with Martindale Hubbell peer reviews when evaluating a complex patent litigation specialist in Chicago.
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
Compare the Avvo lawyer rating system with Martindale Hubbell peer reviews when evaluating a complex patent litigation specialist in Chicago.
3 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Avvo attorney rating methodology 10.0 rating criteria officialGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDYes / no
Martindale-Hubbell peer review ratings methodology AV Preeminent official criteriaGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDReason
Chicago patent litigation attorney evaluation patent litigation experience Federal Circuit IPR IllinoisGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDComparison
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (3)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 3 of 3 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT3 real searches · gpt-6
Avvo attorney rating methodology 10.0 rating criteria official Google ↗
Martindale-Hubbell peer review ratings methodology AV Preeminent official criteria Google ↗
Chicago patent litigation attorney evaluation patent litigation experience Federal Circuit IPR Illinois Google ↗
- The Avvo Rating: What Lawyers should know · avvo.com
- For Consumers: Understanding the Avvo Rating · avvo.com
- AV Peer Review Ratings & Client Review Awards · martindale.com
- How Attorneys Get Reviews from Peers and Clients · martindale.com
- martindale.com · martindale.com
- Avvo attorney profiles and ratings · avvo.com
- CourtListener – federal court opinions and litigation research · courtlistener.com
- USPTO – patent and PTAB proceedings · uspto.gov
Queries
3 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Avvo attorney rating methodology 10.0 rating criteria official OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Yes / no | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
Martindale-Hubbell peer review ratings methodology AV Preeminent official criteria OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
Chicago patent litigation attorney evaluation patent litigation experience Federal Circuit IPR Illinois OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Comparison | — | — | 1x of 1 |