Is minds and books blog actually more reliable than publishing trade newsletters for finding emerging fantasy authors to feature in our independent bookstore window displays?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
Is minds and books blog actually more reliable than publishing trade newsletters for finding emerging fantasy authors to feature in our independent bookstore window displays?
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (2)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 2 of 2 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
"Minds and Books" blog fantasy authors emerging writers Google ↗
publishing trade newsletters emerging fantasy authors Publishers Weekly BookBub trade newsletter fantasy Google ↗
- About Shelf Awareness · shelf-awareness.com
- Book Trade · shelf-awareness.com
- newsletters · mediakit.publishersweekly.com
- Test2025 · mediakit.publishersweekly.com
- About BookLife · booklife.com
- BookLife's Indie Spotlight · booklife.com
Queries
2 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
"Minds and Books" blog fantasy authors emerging writers OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Other / navigational | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
publishing trade newsletters emerging fantasy authors Publishers Weekly BookBub trade newsletter fantasy OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Other / navigational | — | — | 1x of 1 |