What constitutes fair use when referencing iconic brand symbols like the Nike swoosh in satirical digital art, and where is the exact line where parody fails against trademark dilution claims?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
What constitutes fair use when referencing iconic brand symbols like the Nike swoosh in satirical digital art, and where is the exact line where parody fails against trademark dilution claims?
3 real searches · 1 real-search pass
United States Supreme Court Jack Daniel's Properties v VIP Products 2023 trademark parody Rogers test source identifying use opinionGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDReason
15 USC 1125(c)(3) fair use parody noncommercial use trademark dilution statuteGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDReason
United States Supreme Court Campbell v Acuff-Rose parody definition trademark parody fair use Nike swoosh digital artGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDDefinition
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (3)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 3 of 3 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT3 real searches · gpt-6
United States Supreme Court Jack Daniel's Properties v VIP Products 2023 trademark parody Rogers test source identifying use opinion Google ↗
15 USC 1125(c)(3) fair use parody noncommercial use trademark dilution statute Google ↗
United States Supreme Court Campbell v Acuff-Rose parody definition trademark parody fair use Nike swoosh digital art Google ↗
- 15 U.S. Code § 1125 - False designations of origin, false descriptions, and dilution forbidden | U.S. Code | US Law · law.cornell.edu
- 15 U.S. Code § 1125 - False designations of origin, false descriptions, and dilution forbidden | U.S. Code | US Law · law.cornell.edu
- JACK DANIEL’S PROPERTIES, INC. v. VIP PRODUCTS LLC | Supreme Court | US Law · law.cornell.edu
- 22-148 Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC (06/08/2023) · supremecourt.gov
- Jack Daniel's™ Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC | 599 U.S. ___ (2023) · supreme.justia.com
- uscodeweb1.house.gov · uscodeweb1.house.gov
- 15.32 Trademark Dilution (15 U.S.C. § 1125(c)) · www3.ce9.uscourts.gov
- CAMPBELL, AKA SKYYWALKER, ET AL. v. ACUFF-ROSE MUSIC, INC. | Supreme Court | US Law · law.cornell.edu
Queries
3 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
United States Supreme Court Jack Daniel's Properties v VIP Products 2023 trademark parody Rogers test source identifying use opinion OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
15 USC 1125(c)(3) fair use parody noncommercial use trademark dilution statute OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
United States Supreme Court Campbell v Acuff-Rose parody definition trademark parody fair use Nike swoosh digital art OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Definition | — | — | 1x of 1 |