What do cybersecurity experts say about the limitations of evaluating application security testing tools currently on the market?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
What do cybersecurity experts say about the limitations of evaluating application security testing tools currently on the market?
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
expert analysis limitations evaluating application security testing tools benchmarks false positives coverage SAST DAST tools OWASP BenchmarkGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDReason
cybersecurity experts limitations comparing application security testing tools market evaluation methodology false positives real world applicationsGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDComparison
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (2)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 2 of 2 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
expert analysis limitations evaluating application security testing tools benchmarks false positives coverage SAST DAST tools OWASP Benchmark Google ↗
cybersecurity experts limitations comparing application security testing tools market evaluation methodology false positives real world applications Google ↗
- Understanding Industry Perspectives of Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Evaluation · yuan2li.github.io
- A Systematic Literature Review on Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Tools: Evaluation, Benchmarks, Challenges, and Future Directions - King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals · pure.kfupm.edu.sa
- Comparative evaluation of approaches & tools for effective security testing of Web applications · pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Comparison and Evaluation on Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Tools for Java · lingling-fan.github.io
- The SAMM Benchmark Report · owaspsamm.org
- @ctcampbell | Assessing Static Application Security Testing Tools With Synthetic Applications · ctcampbell.github.io
- Key Findings and Limitations of the OWASP Benchmark Project · matthiasrohr.de
- 91% noise: A look at what's wrong with traditional SAST tools · helpnetsecurity.com
Queries
2 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
expert analysis limitations evaluating application security testing tools benchmarks false positives coverage SAST DAST tools OWASP Benchmark OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
cybersecurity experts limitations comparing application security testing tools market evaluation methodology false positives real world applications OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Comparison | — | — | 1x of 1 |