What arguments work best when filing a motion in limine to exclude statements obtained in violation of Miranda during a multi defendant conspiracy trial?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
What arguments work best when filing a motion in limine to exclude statements obtained in violation of Miranda during a multi defendant conspiracy trial?
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (2)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 1 of 2 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
Supreme Court Miranda custodial interrogation exclusion co-defendant statements Bruton Samia 2023 official opinions Google ↗
Federal Rules Evidence 801(d)(2)(E) co-conspirator statements Miranda Bruton Richardson Gray Supreme Court opinions Google ↗
- Supreme Court's Samia opinion · supremecourt.gov
- Federal Rule of Evidence 801 · law.cornell.edu
- Bourjaily · law.cornell.edu
Queries
2 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court Miranda custodial interrogation exclusion co-defendant statements Bruton Samia 2023 official opinions OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
Federal Rules Evidence 801(d)(2)(E) co-conspirator statements Miranda Bruton Richardson Gray Supreme Court opinions OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 |