Real ChatGPT answer · index seedoTfD3de2NcQcompleteHealth and wellness · women's healthcomparison

How do the effectiveness rates of Natural Cycles versus traditional barrier methods compare for college students who occasionally drink alcohol?

ChatGPTgpt-62 queries11/1/2026
Download run

Fan-out diagram

The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.

SEED QUERY
How do the effectiveness rates of Natural Cycles versus traditional barrier methods compare for college students who occasionally drink alcohol?
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Natural Cycles typical use effectiveness 93% perfect use 98% FDA study officialGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDReason
CDC contraception effectiveness external condoms internal condoms diaphragm typical use failure rates 2024Google ↗
OBSERVEDConsequence

Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.

Query classes

Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.

ChatGPT real searches (2)
Short factOther / navigationalComparisonConsequence50%Reason50%DefinitionInstructionYes / no

Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 2 of 2 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.

Searches and sources

ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
Natural Cycles typical use effectiveness 93% perfect use 98% FDA study official Google ↗
CDC contraception effectiveness external condoms internal condoms diaphragm typical use failure rates 2024 Google ↗

Queries

2 queries · click a column to sort
Query / typeSearchIntentQuery classRouting formatClusterFreq ↓Weight
Natural Cycles typical use effectiveness 93% perfect use 98% FDA study official
OBSERVED
Google ↗
AI Mode ↗
—Reason——1x
of 1
CDC contraception effectiveness external condoms internal condoms diaphragm typical use failure rates 2024
OBSERVED
Google ↗
AI Mode ↗
—Consequence——1x
of 1