How does tacking successive periods of adverse possession work under current state laws when transferring possession via verbal agreement?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
How does tacking successive periods of adverse possession work under current state laws when transferring possession via verbal agreement?
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
Classifying 2 queries…
Searches and sources
ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
California adverse possession tacking privity oral agreement transfer possession case law Google ↗
California Code Civil Procedure 318 325 adverse possession five years taxes statute current Google ↗
- Sorensen v. Costa :: :: Supreme Court of California Decisions :: California Case Law :: California Law :: U.S. Law :: Justia · law.justia.com
- SORENSEN v. COSTA (1948) · caselaw.findlaw.com
- California Code of Civil Procedure § 325 (2025) :: 2025 California Code :: U.S. Codes and Statutes :: U.S. Law :: Justia · law.justia.com
- California Code, Code of Civil Procedure - CCP § 325 · codes.findlaw.com
- CACI No. 4900. Adverse Possession :: California Civil Jury Instructions (CACI) (2026) :: Justia · justia.com
Queries
2 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
California adverse possession tacking privity oral agreement transfer possession case law OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | — | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
California Code Civil Procedure 318 325 adverse possession five years taxes statute current OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | — | — | — | 1x of 1 |