Can a non-practicing entity successfully assert design patents against a functional mechanical fastener without risking an inequitable conduct challenge?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
Can a non-practicing entity successfully assert design patents against a functional mechanical fastener without risking an inequitable conduct challenge?
3 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Federal Circuit design patent functionality test mechanical fastener ornamental dictated by function inequitable conduct Therasense standardGoogle ↗
OBSERVED
Federal Circuit inequitable conduct design patent fastener non practicing entity design patent assertionGoogle ↗
OBSERVED
LKQ v General Motors en banc design patent obviousness 2024 functionality testGoogle ↗
OBSERVED
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
Classifying 3 queries…
Searches and sources
ChatGPT3 real searches · gpt-6
Federal Circuit design patent functionality test mechanical fastener ornamental dictated by function inequitable conduct Therasense standard Google ↗
Federal Circuit inequitable conduct design patent fastener non practicing entity design patent assertion Google ↗
LKQ v General Motors en banc design patent obviousness 2024 functionality test Google ↗
- 1504-Examination · uspto.gov
- Trials@uspto.gov · congress.gov
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co., No. 08-1511 (Fed. Cir. 2010) :: Justia · law.justia.com
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co | Case Brief for Law Students · casebriefs.com
- Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co., · uspto.gov
- Case: 21-2348 Document: 227 Page: 10 Filed: 05/21/2024 · cafc.uscourts.gov
- LKQ v. GM: Design Patent Invalidity A Year Later · americanbar.org
- B. Inequitable Conduct · ded.uscourts.gov
- To show inequitable conduct, an accused infringer must generally show (1) “that the patentee acted with the specific intent to deceive the PTO” and (2) that “but for” the misrepresentation, the patent would not have issued. *Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.*, 649 F.3d 1276, 1290 (Fed.Cir.2011) (en banc). There is no dispute that misrepresentations of inventorship are material. *See PerSeptive Biosystems, Inc. v. Pharmacia Biotech, Inc.*, 225 F.3d 1315, 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2000) (“As a cri · ded.uscourts.gov
Queries
3 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Federal Circuit design patent functionality test mechanical fastener ornamental dictated by function inequitable conduct Therasense standard OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | — | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
Federal Circuit inequitable conduct design patent fastener non practicing entity design patent assertion OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | — | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
LKQ v General Motors en banc design patent obviousness 2024 functionality test OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | — | — | — | 1x of 1 |