What is the current standard required by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to institute an Inter Partes Review against a questionable software patent?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
What is the current standard required by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to institute an Inter Partes Review against a questionable software patent?
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
Classifying 2 queries…
Searches and sources
ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
2026 PTAB inter partes review institution standard 35 USC 314 reasonable likelihood discretionary denial current USPTO policy Google ↗
USPTO 2025 2026 interim process IPR institution discretionary denial Fintiv Director guidance Google ↗
- Interim Director Discretionary Process · uspto.gov
- USPTO issues new interim process concerning institution of AIA proceedings · uspto.gov
- Director institution of AIA trial proceedings · content.govdelivery.com
- FAQs for Interim Processes for PTAB Workload Management · uspto.gov
- USPTO director clarifies policy on IPR discretionary denials · reuters.com
- 35 U.S.C. § 311: Inter partes review · uscode.house.gov
- 35 U.S.C. § 312: Petitions · uscode.house.gov
Queries
2 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2026 PTAB inter partes review institution standard 35 USC 314 reasonable likelihood discretionary denial current USPTO policy OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | — | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
USPTO 2025 2026 interim process IPR institution discretionary denial Fintiv Director guidance OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | — | — | — | 1x of 1 |