How do forensic accountants dismantle the state methodology in tax evasion cases where the net worth method of proof was utilized?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
How do forensic accountants dismantle the state methodology in tax evasion cases where the net worth method of proof was utilized?
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (2)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 2 of 2 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
Holland v. United States net worth method proof safeguards opening net worth reasonable certainty leads investigation Google ↗
IRS Criminal Investigation net worth method proof tax evasion manual assets liabilities expenditures nontaxable receipts Google ↗
- 9.5.9 Methods of Proof · irs.gov
- Holland v. United States | 348 U.S. 121 (1954) · supreme.justia.com
- Marion L. HOLLAND and Ethel E. Holland, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES of America. | Supreme Court | US Law · law.cornell.edu
- Criminal Tax Manual 2012 · justice.gov
Queries
2 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Holland v. United States net worth method proof safeguards opening net worth reasonable certainty leads investigation OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
IRS Criminal Investigation net worth method proof tax evasion manual assets liabilities expenditures nontaxable receipts OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Instruction | — | — | 1x of 1 |