How do appellate courts currently interpret the scope of automatic stay protections when dealing with pre petition enforcement actions by secured lenders
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
How do appellate courts currently interpret the scope of automatic stay protections when dealing with pre petition enforcement actions by secured lenders
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
federal appellate courts automatic stay 11 USC 362 secured creditor prepetition foreclosure continuation enforcement action Supreme Court circuit decisions 2024 2025 2026Google ↗
OBSERVEDReason
Supreme Court automatic stay section 362 acts to obtain possession exercise control property estate City of Chicago Fulton appellate decisions secured creditorGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDReason
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (2)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 2 of 2 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
federal appellate courts automatic stay 11 USC 362 secured creditor prepetition foreclosure continuation enforcement action Supreme Court circuit decisions 2024 2025 2026 Google ↗
Supreme Court automatic stay section 362 acts to obtain possession exercise control property estate City of Chicago Fulton appellate decisions secured creditor Google ↗
- 11 U.S.C. § 362: Automatic stay · uscode.house.gov
- 11 U.S. Code § 362 - Automatic stay | U.S. Code | US Law · law.cornell.edu
- 19-357 Chicago v. Fulton (01/14/2021) · supremecourt.gov
- CHICAGO v. FULTON | Supreme Court | US Law · law.cornell.edu
- Chicago v. Fulton | 592 U.S. ___ (2021) · supreme.justia.com
- In re: Eileen Fogarty, No. 20-2187 (2d Cir. 2022) :: Justia · law.justia.com
- IN RE: Eileen FOGARTY (2022) · caselaw.findlaw.com
- Hearing, the Court determined that: (i) the automatic stay imposed by § 362(a) did not preclude the post-petition delivery of the deed to the successful purchaser of the Property at the prepetition foreclosure sale, and (ii) even if the automatic stay prevented the post-petition delivery of the deed, stay relief was warranted under § 362(d)(1) and (d)(2). · nyeb.uscourts.gov
- Case 8-23-72942-reg Doc 51 Filed 05/01/24 Entered 05/01/24 13:25:37 · govinfo.gov
Queries
2 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
federal appellate courts automatic stay 11 USC 362 secured creditor prepetition foreclosure continuation enforcement action Supreme Court circuit decisions 2024 2025 2026 OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
Supreme Court automatic stay section 362 acts to obtain possession exercise control property estate City of Chicago Fulton appellate decisions secured creditor OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 |