Could someone explain how patentability requirements work for software inventions, specifically regarding abstract ideas versus technical processes?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
Could someone explain how patentability requirements work for software inventions, specifically regarding abstract ideas versus technical processes?
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (2)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 2 of 2 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
USPTO patent subject matter eligibility software abstract ideas Alice two-step framework MPEP 2106 Google ↗
Supreme Court Alice Corp CLS Bank 2014 abstract idea significantly more patent eligibility software Google ↗
- 2106-Patent Subject Matter Eligibility · uspto.gov
- Patentability of Abstract Ideas · law.cornell.edu
Queries
2 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USPTO patent subject matter eligibility software abstract ideas Alice two-step framework MPEP 2106 OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
Supreme Court Alice Corp CLS Bank 2014 abstract idea significantly more patent eligibility software OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 |