How do federal prosecutors establish constructive possession in drug cases where multiple individuals had access to the same residential property?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
How do federal prosecutors establish constructive possession in drug cases where multiple individuals had access to the same residential property?
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (2)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 2 of 2 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
federal constructive possession shared residence joint occupancy mere presence dominion control Ninth Circuit United States v. Wright Google ↗
Supreme Court constructive possession drugs shared premises knowledge dominion control federal cases Google ↗
- cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov · cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov
- United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Edward Terry, Defendant-appellant, 911 F.2d 272 (9th Cir. 1990) :: Justia · law.justia.com
- USA V. MARTIN MURILLO-BARRIGA, No. 13-30060 (9th Cir. 2014) :: Justia · law.justia.com
Queries
2 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
federal constructive possession shared residence joint occupancy mere presence dominion control Ninth Circuit United States v. Wright OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
Supreme Court constructive possession drugs shared premises knowledge dominion control federal cases OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 |