How does the appeals process in the state appellate court differ from filing a writ of habeas corpus in federal court after a conviction?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
How does the appeals process in the state appellate court differ from filing a writ of habeas corpus in federal court after a conviction?
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (2)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 2 of 2 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
28 U.S.C. 2254 text AEDPA one year limitations exhaustion procedural default standards federal habeas state conviction Google ↗
state criminal direct appeal process appellate court record standard of review official court Google ↗
- 28 U.S. Code § 2254 - State custody; remedies in Federal courts | U.S. Code | US Law · law.cornell.edu
- 28 U.S.C. § 2254: State custody; remedies in Federal courts · uscode.house.gov
- II. AEDPA STANDARDS · govinfo.gov
- U.S.C. Title 28 · govinfo.gov
Queries
2 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
28 U.S.C. 2254 text AEDPA one year limitations exhaustion procedural default standards federal habeas state conviction OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
state criminal direct appeal process appellate court record standard of review official court OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 |