Are natural wool branches better than synthetic climbing ropes for preventing foot pad abrasions in captive southern flying squirrels during high-energy night activity?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
Are natural wool branches better than synthetic climbing ropes for preventing foot pad abrasions in captive southern flying squirrels during high-energy night activity?
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (2)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 2 of 2 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
Queries
2 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
southern flying squirrel captive husbandry foot pad abrasions rope branches substrate enrichment OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
sugar glider foot pad abrasions rope perches natural branches synthetic rope captive small mammals OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Other / navigational | — | — | 1x of 1 |