Real ChatGPT answer · index seedb7yEo8X3610completeAutomotive · car reliability and safetycommercial
Can you compare the real world safety records and recall frequencies of the Tesla Autopilot system versus standard driver assist features in cheaper cars?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
Can you compare the real world safety records and recall frequencies of the Tesla Autopilot system versus standard driver assist features in cheaper cars?
4 real searches · 1 real-search pass
NHTSA Tesla Autopilot crash investigation recall 2023 2024 2025 safety statistics ODI reportGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDReason
NHTSA standing general order crash reporting ADAS Tesla Autopilot data limitations comparison driver assistance systemsGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDReason
IIHS driver assistance systems real world crash rates adaptive cruise lane centering study Tesla AutopilotGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDReason
NHTSA automatic emergency braking recall lane keeping assist recalls 2024 2025 vehiclesGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDConsequence
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (4)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 3 of 4 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT4 real searches · gpt-6
NHTSA Tesla Autopilot crash investigation recall 2023 2024 2025 safety statistics ODI report Google ↗
NHTSA standing general order crash reporting ADAS Tesla Autopilot data limitations comparison driver assistance systems Google ↗
IIHS driver assistance systems real world crash rates adaptive cruise lane centering study Tesla Autopilot Google ↗
NHTSA automatic emergency braking recall lane keeping assist recalls 2024 2025 vehicles Google ↗
- This analysis, conducted before Recall 23V838, indicated that drivers involved in the crashes were not sufficiently engaged in the driving task and that the warnings provided by Autopilot when Autosteer was engaged did not adequately ensure that drivers maintained their attention on the driving task. The drivers were involved in crashes while using Autopilot despite fulfilling Tesla’s pre-recall driver engagement monitoring criteria. Crashes with no or late evasive action attempted by the driver · static.nhtsa.gov
- ODI RESUME U.S. Department of Transportation Na · static.nhtsa.gov
- US probes whether Tesla Autopilot recall did enough to make sure drivers pay attention · apnews.com
- Advanced driver assistance · iihs.org
- NHTSA 2023 Annual Report Safety Recalls Published March 2024 · nhtsa.gov
- Standing General Order on Crash Reporting · nhtsa.gov
- Standing General Order on Crash Reporting · nhtsa.gov
- Recall Quarterly Report · static.nhtsa.gov
- May 6, 2024 · static.nhtsa.gov
- IIHS-HLDI research finds little evidence that partial automation prevents crashes · iihs.org
- Convenience or safety system? Crash rates of vehicles equipped with partial driving automation · iihs.org
Queries
4 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHTSA Tesla Autopilot crash investigation recall 2023 2024 2025 safety statistics ODI report OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
NHTSA standing general order crash reporting ADAS Tesla Autopilot data limitations comparison driver assistance systems OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
IIHS driver assistance systems real world crash rates adaptive cruise lane centering study Tesla Autopilot OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
NHTSA automatic emergency braking recall lane keeping assist recalls 2024 2025 vehicles OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Consequence | — | — | 1x of 1 |