Real ChatGPT answer · index seedaDlljtLbPfwcompleteMarketing and advertising · web analyticscomparison
What is the easiest way to compare traffic acquisition channels effectively in GA4 when dealing with messy UTM parameters from multiple agency partners?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
What is the easiest way to compare traffic acquisition channels effectively in GA4 when dealing with messy UTM parameters from multiple agency partners?
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (2)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 2 of 2 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
GA4 custom channel groups create rules source medium traffic acquisition dimensions official documentation Google ↗
GA4 traffic acquisition report session source medium campaign official documentation Google ↗
- [GA4] Traffic acquisition report - Computer · support.google.com
- Traffic-source dimensions, manual tagging, and auto-tagging · support.google.com
- Custom channel groups · support.google.com
Queries
2 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GA4 custom channel groups create rules source medium traffic acquisition dimensions official documentation OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Instruction | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
GA4 traffic acquisition report session source medium campaign official documentation OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 |