Real ChatGPT answer · index seedYZyupGVQiXccompleteB2B softwarecommercial
How effective are modern software bill of materials generators at detecting known vulnerabilities in transitive dependencies during pull request reviews in GitHub Enterprise?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
How effective are modern software bill of materials generators at detecting known vulnerabilities in transitive dependencies during pull request reviews in GitHub Enterprise?
4 real searches · 1 real-search pass
GitHub Enterprise dependency review action transitive dependencies pull request documentation SBOM vulnerability scanningGoogle ↗
OBSERVED
SBOM vulnerability detection transitive dependencies limitations package manager lockfiles researchGoogle ↗
OBSERVED
Syft Grype vulnerability scanning SBOM transitive dependencies documentationGoogle ↗
OBSERVED
OWASP CycloneDX SBOM vulnerability analysis known vulnerabilities transitive dependenciesGoogle ↗
OBSERVED
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
Classifying 4 queries…
Searches and sources
ChatGPT4 real searches · gpt-6
GitHub Enterprise dependency review action transitive dependencies pull request documentation SBOM vulnerability scanning Google ↗
SBOM vulnerability detection transitive dependencies limitations package manager lockfiles research Google ↗
Syft Grype vulnerability scanning SBOM transitive dependencies documentation Google ↗
OWASP CycloneDX SBOM vulnerability analysis known vulnerabilities transitive dependencies Google ↗
12 cited sources
- Syft documentation · github.com
- CycloneDX · cyclonedx.org
- Dependency-Track · dependencytrack.org
- GitHub Code Security documentation · docs.github.com
- Accurate and Efficient SBOM Generation for Software Supply Chain Security · escholarship.org
- A Reality Check on SBOM-based Vulnerability Management: An Empirical Study and A Path Forward · arxiv.org
- How the dependency graph recognizes dependencies · docs.github.com
- Dependency review · docs.github.com
- Dependency review · docs.github.com
- dependency-review-action/README.md at main · actions/dependency-review-action · github.com
- Dependency review · docs.github.com
- Reviewing dependency changes in a pull request · docs.github.com
Queries
4 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GitHub Enterprise dependency review action transitive dependencies pull request documentation SBOM vulnerability scanning OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | — | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
SBOM vulnerability detection transitive dependencies limitations package manager lockfiles research OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | — | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
Syft Grype vulnerability scanning SBOM transitive dependencies documentation OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | — | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
OWASP CycloneDX SBOM vulnerability analysis known vulnerabilities transitive dependencies OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | — | — | — | 1x of 1 |