How does AT&T's low-band 5G coverage footprint compare to T-Mobile's extensive mid-band deployment when testing inside commercial steel and concrete buildings?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
How does AT&T's low-band 5G coverage footprint compare to T-Mobile's extensive mid-band deployment when testing inside commercial steel and concrete buildings?
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (2)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 1 of 2 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
AT&T 5G low band 850 MHz n5 coverage deployment indoor penetration T-Mobile 2.5 GHz n41 midband coverage 2025 2026 Google ↗
FCC building penetration loss 850 MHz 2.5 GHz concrete steel indoor cellular propagation study Google ↗
- Computer Networks 237 (2023) 110060 · par.nsf.gov
- A Comprehensive Real-World Evaluation of 5G · par.nsf.gov
- T-Mobile network | T-Mobile Support: Help with Devices, Plans, Billing & More · t-mobile.com
- 3. Current and Planned Mid-band Deployment Status in the U.S. · ntia.gov
Queries
2 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AT&T 5G low band 850 MHz n5 coverage deployment indoor penetration T-Mobile 2.5 GHz n41 midband coverage 2025 2026 OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Other / navigational | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
FCC building penetration loss 850 MHz 2.5 GHz concrete steel indoor cellular propagation study OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 |