What is the difference between filing a patent infringement lawsuit in the Eastern District of Texas versus the Northern District of California for a software enterprise
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
What is the difference between filing a patent infringement lawsuit in the Eastern District of Texas versus the Northern District of California for a software enterprise
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Eastern District of Texas local patent rules current 2026 patent cases venue 28 USC 1400(b) Northern District California patent local rulesGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDReason
Federal Circuit patent venue TC Heartland Cray corporate residence regular and established place of business 28 USC 1400(b) transfer convenience §1404(a) patent litigationGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDConsequence
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (2)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 2 of 2 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
Eastern District of Texas local patent rules current 2026 patent cases venue 28 USC 1400(b) Northern District California patent local rules Google ↗
Federal Circuit patent venue TC Heartland Cray corporate residence regular and established place of business 28 USC 1400(b) transfer convenience §1404(a) patent litigation Google ↗
- 16-341 TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC (05/22/2017) · supremecourt.gov
- TC HEARTLAND LLC v. KRAFT FOODS GROUP BRANDS LLC | Supreme Court | US Law · law.cornell.edu
- In re: Cray, Inc., No. 17-129 (Fed. Cir. 2017) :: Justia · law.justia.com
- U.S.C. Title 28 · govinfo.gov
- Patent System of the US · wipo.int
Queries
2 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eastern District of Texas local patent rules current 2026 patent cases venue 28 USC 1400(b) Northern District California patent local rules OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
Federal Circuit patent venue TC Heartland Cray corporate residence regular and established place of business 28 USC 1400(b) transfer convenience §1404(a) patent litigation OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Consequence | — | — | 1x of 1 |