What constitutes defamation by a business competitor under current federal guidelines, and what evidence do I need to preserve?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
What constitutes defamation by a business competitor under current federal guidelines, and what evidence do I need to preserve?
3 real searches · 1 real-search pass
U.S. business competitor defamation elements state law federal First Amendment actual malice public concern commercial speech Lanham Act false advertising Supreme CourtGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDComparison
Supreme Court defamation business corporation actual malice New York Times Gertz Dun Bradstreet Lanham Act false advertising competitorGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDComparison
Florida business defamation elements trade libel commercial disparagement statute of limitations evidence preservationGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDReason
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (3)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 3 of 3 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT3 real searches · gpt-6
U.S. business competitor defamation elements state law federal First Amendment actual malice public concern commercial speech Lanham Act false advertising Supreme Court Google ↗
Supreme Court defamation business corporation actual malice New York Times Gertz Dun Bradstreet Lanham Act false advertising competitor Google ↗
Florida business defamation elements trade libel commercial disparagement statute of limitations evidence preservation Google ↗
- SJI Civil Approved Amendments Defamation Instructions · www-media.floridabar.org
- Florida Defamation Law · dmlp.org
- Chapter 770 - 2026 Florida Statutes · flsenate.gov
- LEXMARK INT’L INC. v. STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC. | Supreme Court | US Law · law.cornell.edu
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders | 472 U.S. 749 (1985) · supreme.justia.com
- DUN & BRADSTREET, INC., Petitioner v. GREENMOSS BUILDERS, INC. | Supreme Court | US Law · law.cornell.edu
- HARTE-HANKS COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Petitioner v. Daniel CONNAUGHTON. | Supreme Court | US Law · law.cornell.edu
Queries
3 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U.S. business competitor defamation elements state law federal First Amendment actual malice public concern commercial speech Lanham Act false advertising Supreme Court OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Comparison | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
Supreme Court defamation business corporation actual malice New York Times Gertz Dun Bradstreet Lanham Act false advertising competitor OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Comparison | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
Florida business defamation elements trade libel commercial disparagement statute of limitations evidence preservation OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 |