How do immigration lawyers interpret the substantial authority and international recognition standards required for EB 1A extraordinary ability self petitions?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
How do immigration lawyers interpret the substantial authority and international recognition standards required for EB 1A extraordinary ability self petitions?
3 real searches · 1 real-search pass
USCIS EB-1A extraordinary ability sustained national or international acclaim final merits determination policy manual substantial authority standardGoogle ↗
OBSERVED
8 CFR 204.5(h) extraordinary ability regulation national international acclaim criteriaGoogle ↗
OBSERVED
Kazarian v USCIS two step EB-1A final merits determination Ninth CircuitGoogle ↗
OBSERVED
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
Classifying 3 queries…
Searches and sources
ChatGPT3 real searches · gpt-6
USCIS EB-1A extraordinary ability sustained national or international acclaim final merits determination policy manual substantial authority standard Google ↗
8 CFR 204.5(h) extraordinary ability regulation national international acclaim criteria Google ↗
Kazarian v USCIS two step EB-1A final merits determination Ninth Circuit Google ↗
- Chapter 2 - Extraordinary Ability · uscis-govdhs.us
- 8 CFR § 204.5 - Petitions for employment-based immigrants. | Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (e-CFR) | US Law · law.cornell.edu
- U.S. Department of Homeland Security · uscis.gov
- Chapter 2 - Extraordinary Ability · ussciss.us
Queries
3 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USCIS EB-1A extraordinary ability sustained national or international acclaim final merits determination policy manual substantial authority standard OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | — | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
8 CFR 204.5(h) extraordinary ability regulation national international acclaim criteria OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | — | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
Kazarian v USCIS two step EB-1A final merits determination Ninth Circuit OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | — | — | — | 1x of 1 |