How do I legally and cheaply bill for scope creep when a client verbally requests extra features outside our signed contract?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
How do I legally and cheaply bill for scope creep when a client verbally requests extra features outside our signed contract?
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (2)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 2 of 2 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
Illinois contract law oral modification written agreement no oral modifications clause change order scope creep enforceability Google ↗
Illinois small business contract change order additional work written approval contract law Google ↗
- No. 1-03-0566, Schwinder v. Austin Bank · illinoiscourts.gov
- 1-14-0463 Accordingly, we find that there is no g · illinoiscourts.gov
- Illinois General Assembly · ilga.gov
- Central Illinois Public Service Co. v. Atlas Minerals, Inc., 965 F. Supp. 1162 (C.D. Ill. 1997) :: Justia · law.justia.com
Queries
2 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Illinois contract law oral modification written agreement no oral modifications clause change order scope creep enforceability OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
Illinois small business contract change order additional work written approval contract law OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 |