What criteria should I use to evaluate the smart contract security audits of emerging liquid staking protocols before delegating my SOL tokens for yield?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
What criteria should I use to evaluate the smart contract security audits of emerging liquid staking protocols before delegating my SOL tokens for yield?
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (2)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 2 of 2 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
Solana liquid staking security audit checklist stake pool program security best practices audit reports Google ↗
Solana stake pool program documentation withdraw authority validator allocation slashing liquid staking security Google ↗
- Staking on Solana · solana.com
- Delegation Criteria · solana.org
- Auditing Smart Contracts on Solana: Security Checks · certora.com
- Certora's Formal Verification of SPL Stake Pool · certora.com
- Read technical documentation · solana-program.com
- Examine audit information · github.com
- Read the audit report · app.marinade.finance
Queries
2 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Solana liquid staking security audit checklist stake pool program security best practices audit reports OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
Solana stake pool program documentation withdraw authority validator allocation slashing liquid staking security OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 |