How does the doctrine of equivalents apply when an accused infringer modifies a patented database encryption method by substituting an open-source library for a proprietary module?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
How does the doctrine of equivalents apply when an accused infringer modifies a patented database encryption method by substituting an open-source library for a proprietary module?
1 real search · 1 real-search pass
U.S. Supreme Court doctrine of equivalents Warner-Jenkinson function way result all elements rule Festo prosecution history estoppel patentGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDConsequence
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (1)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 1 of 1 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT1 real searches · gpt-6
U.S. Supreme Court doctrine of equivalents Warner-Jenkinson function way result all elements rule Festo prosecution history estoppel patent Google ↗
- Warner-Jenkinson Co., Inc. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co. | 520 U.S. 17 (1997) · supreme.justia.com
- FESTO CORP. v. SHOKETSU KINZOKU KOGYOKABUSHIKI CO. | Supreme Court | US Law · law.cornell.edu
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co. | 535 U.S. 722 (2002) · supreme.justia.com
- WARNER-JENKINSON COMPANY, INC., Petitioner v. HILTON DAVIS CHEMICAL CO. | Supreme Court | US Law · law.cornell.edu
- United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · cafc.uscourts.gov