What risks are involved when our marketing team references competitor product names in comparative advertising under current Lanham Act interpretations?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
What risks are involved when our marketing team references competitor product names in comparative advertising under current Lanham Act interpretations?
3 real searches · 1 real-search pass
2026 Lanham Act comparative advertising competitor trademark product names nominative fair use Ninth Circuit current casesGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDReason
Lanham Act false advertising comparative claims competitor product name materiality substantiation Lexmark Supreme CourtGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDComparison
FTC comparative advertising policy statement objective claims substantiation competitor productsGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDComparison
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (3)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 3 of 3 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT3 real searches · gpt-6
2026 Lanham Act comparative advertising competitor trademark product names nominative fair use Ninth Circuit current cases Google ↗
Lanham Act false advertising comparative claims competitor product name materiality substantiation Lexmark Supreme Court Google ↗
FTC comparative advertising policy statement objective claims substantiation competitor products Google ↗
- YUGA LABS INC v. RIPPS (2025) · caselaw.findlaw.com
- LEXMARK INT’L INC. v. STATIC CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC. | Supreme Court | US Law · law.cornell.edu
- Statement of Policy Regarding Comparative Advertising · ftc.gov
- FTC Policy Statement Regarding Advertising Substantiation · ftc.gov
- 15 U.S.C. § 1125 · law.cornell.edu
- 15 U.S.C. § 1114 · law.cornell.edu
- New Kids on the Block v. News America Publishing (9th Cir. 1992) · law.justia.com
Queries
3 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2026 Lanham Act comparative advertising competitor trademark product names nominative fair use Ninth Circuit current cases OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
Lanham Act false advertising comparative claims competitor product name materiality substantiation Lexmark Supreme Court OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Comparison | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
FTC comparative advertising policy statement objective claims substantiation competitor products OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Comparison | — | — | 1x of 1 |