We need to patch a prompt injection vulnerability in our LangChain app today so should we use Rebuff or implement custom input sanitization
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
We need to patch a prompt injection vulnerability in our LangChain app today so should we use Rebuff or implement custom input sanitization
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (2)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 2 of 2 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
Rebuff prompt injection framework LangChain GitHub maintenance status 2026 Google ↗
LangChain prompt injection defense recommendations tool security untrusted input 2026 Google ↗
- GitHub - protectai/rebuff: LLM Prompt Injection Detector · github.com
- Rebuff: Detecting Prompt Injection Attacks · langchain.com
- LLM Prompt Injection Prevention · cheatsheetseries.owasp.org
- rebuff/README.md at main · protectai/rebuff · github.com
- 2. Prompt Injection (Direct / Indirect) · learn.microsoft.com
Queries
2 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rebuff prompt injection framework LangChain GitHub maintenance status 2026 OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
LangChain prompt injection defense recommendations tool security untrusted input 2026 OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Other / navigational | — | — | 1x of 1 |