What is the most cost-effective way to protect my app development company from ownership disputes regarding AI-generated code under current laws?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
What is the most cost-effective way to protect my app development company from ownership disputes regarding AI-generated code under current laws?
3 real searches · 1 real-search pass
2026 United States Copyright Office AI-generated works copyrightability human authorship guidance report part 2 2025Google ↗
OBSERVEDReason
North Carolina employee invention assignment intellectual property law contractor software code ownership copyright work made for hireGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDReason
US Copyright Act work made for hire commissioned software contractor copyright assignment signed writing 17 USC 101 201Google ↗
OBSERVEDReason
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (3)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 3 of 3 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT3 real searches · gpt-6
2026 United States Copyright Office AI-generated works copyrightability human authorship guidance report part 2 2025 Google ↗
North Carolina employee invention assignment intellectual property law contractor software code ownership copyright work made for hire Google ↗
US Copyright Act work made for hire commissioned software contractor copyright assignment signed writing 17 USC 101 201 Google ↗
Queries
3 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2026 United States Copyright Office AI-generated works copyrightability human authorship guidance report part 2 2025 OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
North Carolina employee invention assignment intellectual property law contractor software code ownership copyright work made for hire OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
US Copyright Act work made for hire commissioned software contractor copyright assignment signed writing 17 USC 101 201 OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 |