How can we fine-tune our embedding models and indexing strategy for significantly better vector search accuracy?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
How can we fine-tune our embedding models and indexing strategy for significantly better vector search accuracy?
1 real search · 1 real-search pass
embedding model fine tuning contrastive learning hard negatives vector search hybrid retrieval reranking evaluation official documentation 2025 2026Google ↗
OBSERVEDReason
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (1)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 1 of 1 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT1 real searches · gpt-6
embedding model fine tuning contrastive learning hard negatives vector search hybrid retrieval reranking evaluation official documentation 2025 2026 Google ↗
- Contextual retrieval in AI systems \ Anthropic · anthropic.com
- architecture-center/docs/ai-ml/guide/rag/rag-information-retrieval.md at main · MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center · github.com
- Retrieval Fine-Tuning (Bi-Encoder and Cross-Encoder) · docs.nvidia.com
- Improving Retrieval and RAG with Embedding Model Finetuning · databricks.com
- AI Search retrieval quality guide - Azure Databricks · learn.microsoft.com