What are the specific evidentiary requirements needed to prove willful infringement in a federal patent litigation case involving semiconductor manufacturing processes?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
What are the specific evidentiary requirements needed to prove willful infringement in a federal patent litigation case involving semiconductor manufacturing processes?
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Federal Circuit patent willful infringement evidentiary standard Halo SRI Cisco preponderance knowledge patent deliberate infringement semiconductor process evidenceGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDReason
Federal Circuit willfulness patent infringement post-suit knowledge patent opinion evidence source code process manufacturing Halo Eko BrandsGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDOther / navigational
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (2)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 2 of 2 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
Federal Circuit patent willful infringement evidentiary standard Halo SRI Cisco preponderance knowledge patent deliberate infringement semiconductor process evidence Google ↗
Federal Circuit willfulness patent infringement post-suit knowledge patent opinion evidence source code process manufacturing Halo Eko Brands Google ↗
- Halo Elecs., Inc. v. Pulse Elecs., Inc. | 579 U.S. ___ (2016) · supreme.justia.com
- Pattern Jury Instructions of the Seventh Circuit (Patents) · ca7.uscourts.gov
- SRI International, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 20-1685 (Fed. Cir. 2021) :: Justia · law.justia.com
- Eko Brands, LLC v. Adrian Rivera Maynez Enterprises, Inc., No. 18-2215 (Fed. Cir. 2020) :: Justia · law.justia.com
- 3. Willful Infringement · ded.uscourts.gov
- To sustain a willfulness claim, a plaintiff must plead both knowledge of the patent and of the infringement. *iFIT Inc. v. Peloton Interactive, Inc.*, C.A. No. 21-507-RGA, 2022 WL 609605, at *2 (D. Del. Jan. 28, 2022); *see also Halo Elecs., Inc. v. Pulse Elecs., Inc.*, 579 U.S. 93, 105 (2016); *Bayer Healthcare LLC v. Baxalta Inc.*, 989 F.3d 964, 988 (Fed. Cir. 2021); *SRI Int’l, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.*, 14 F.4th 1323, 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2021). · ded.uscourts.gov
Queries
2 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Federal Circuit patent willful infringement evidentiary standard Halo SRI Cisco preponderance knowledge patent deliberate infringement semiconductor process evidence OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
Federal Circuit willfulness patent infringement post-suit knowledge patent opinion evidence source code process manufacturing Halo Eko Brands OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Other / navigational | — | — | 1x of 1 |