Is Quicken WillMaker actually legally binding in my state or should I budget for a real lawyer to review it?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
Is Quicken WillMaker actually legally binding in my state or should I budget for a real lawyer to review it?
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (2)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 2 of 2 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
Virginia official law requirements valid will two witnesses self proving affidavit holographic will Code 64.2-403 64.2-452 Google ↗
Quicken WillMaker Virginia state-specific legal forms attorney review limitations Google ↗
- § 64.2-403. Execution of wills; requirements · law.lis.virginia.gov
- Code of Virginia Code · law.lis.virginia.gov
- § 64.2-452. How will may be made self-proved; affidavits of witnesses · law.lis.virginia.gov
- Code of Virginia · law.lis.virginia.gov
- Quicken WillMaker License Agreement · willmaker.com
Queries
2 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Virginia official law requirements valid will two witnesses self proving affidavit holographic will Code 64.2-403 64.2-452 OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Yes / no | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
Quicken WillMaker Virginia state-specific legal forms attorney review limitations OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Instruction | — | — | 1x of 1 |