What are developers currently using to automatically scan npm packages for zero-day vulnerabilities in a GitLab CI environment?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
What are developers currently using to automatically scan npm packages for zero-day vulnerabilities in a GitLab CI environment?
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (2)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 2 of 2 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
GitLab CI npm supply chain security scanner zero-day package analysis Socket Phylum documentation 2026 Google ↗
2026 npm package security scanners zero day supply chain detection GitLab CI Socket Phylum Snyk OSV-Scanner GitLab Dependency Scanning Google ↗
- socket.dev · socket.dev
- Website · snyk.io
- Documentation · docs.snyk.io
- GitHub repository · github.com
- OSV database · osv.dev
- Website · phylum.io
- Documentation · docs.npmjs.com
- socket scan · docs.socket.dev
- Socket for GitLab · socket.dev
- Dependency scanning · docs.gitlab.com
- ENISA Technical Advisory for Secure Use of Package Managers · enisa.europa.eu
Queries
2 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GitLab CI npm supply chain security scanner zero-day package analysis Socket Phylum documentation 2026 OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Other / navigational | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
2026 npm package security scanners zero day supply chain detection GitLab CI Socket Phylum Snyk OSV-Scanner GitLab Dependency Scanning OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Comparison | — | — | 1x of 1 |