What steps does the prosecution have to follow to prove I intentionally accessed a protected computer without authorization
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
What steps does the prosecution have to follow to prove I intentionally accessed a protected computer without authorization
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
Classifying 2 queries…
Searches and sources
ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
18 U.S.C. 1030(a)(2) elements intentionally accesses without authorization protected computer Supreme Court Van Buren DOJ Google ↗
CFAA jury instructions intentionally accesses without authorization protected computer elements beyond reasonable doubt Google ↗
- 8.97 Obtaining Information by Computer—"Protected" Computer · www3.ce9.uscourts.gov
- 18 U.S.C. § 1030: Fraud and related activity in connection with computers · uscode.house.gov
- U.S.C. Title 18 · govinfo.gov
- Justice Manual | 9-48.000 - Computer Fraud and Abuse Act · justice.gov
- 19-783 Van Buren v. United States (06/03/2021) · supremecourt.gov
- VAN BUREN v. UNITED STATES | Supreme Court | US Law · law.cornell.edu
Queries
2 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18 U.S.C. 1030(a)(2) elements intentionally accesses without authorization protected computer Supreme Court Van Buren DOJ OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | — | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
CFAA jury instructions intentionally accesses without authorization protected computer elements beyond reasonable doubt OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | — | — | — | 1x of 1 |