If an independent contractor writes core database optimization algorithms without a signed assignment of inventions agreement, who legally owns the intellectual property under current Ninth Circuit precedent?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
If an independent contractor writes core database optimization algorithms without a signed assignment of inventions agreement, who legally owns the intellectual property under current Ninth Circuit precedent?
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
Ninth Circuit independent contractor intellectual property ownership no signed invention assignment agreement algorithms copyright patent JustMed v ByceGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDReason
Ninth Circuit contractor owns inventions absent written assignment patent copyright work made for hire software contractor caseGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDReason
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (2)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 2 of 2 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
Ninth Circuit independent contractor intellectual property ownership no signed invention assignment agreement algorithms copyright patent JustMed v Byce Google ↗
Ninth Circuit contractor owns inventions absent written assignment patent copyright work made for hire software contractor case Google ↗
- 5154 JUSTMED, INC. v. BYCE · cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov
- Jennifer Dumas, an Individual and Successor-in-interest Topatrick Nagel, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Stefan Gommerman, Dba Eva & Steve Dorog Gallery; S & Igommerman Publishing, Inc., Defendants-appellants, 865 F.2d 1093 (9th Cir. 1989) :: Justia · law.justia.com
- Justmed, Inc. v. Byce, No. 07-35861 (9th Cir. 2010) :: Justia · law.justia.com
- 5160 JUSTMED, INC. v. BYCE · cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov
- 35 U.S.C. § 261: Ownership; assignment · uscode.house.gov
- 301-Ownership/Assignability of Patents and Applications · uspto.gov
- U.S. Auto Parts Network v. Parts Geek 10405 · cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov
- U.S. Auto Parts Network, Inc. v. Parts Geek, LLC, et al., No. 10-56129 (9th Cir. 2012) :: Justia · law.justia.com
Queries
2 queries · click a column to sort
| Query / type | Search | Intent | Query class | Routing format | Cluster | Freq ↓ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ninth Circuit independent contractor intellectual property ownership no signed invention assignment agreement algorithms copyright patent JustMed v Byce OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 | |
Ninth Circuit contractor owns inventions absent written assignment patent copyright work made for hire software contractor case OBSERVED | Google ↗ AI Mode ↗ | — | Reason | — | — | 1x of 1 |