Real ChatGPT answer · index seed5ISdyhxDK6IcompleteLegal · personal injurycomparison

Strict contributory negligence versus comparative fault in injury cases involving minor pedestrians

ChatGPTgpt-62 queries11/1/2026
Download run

Fan-out diagram

The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.

SEED QUERY
Strict contributory negligence versus comparative fault in injury cases involving minor pedestrians
2 real searches · 1 real-search pass
minor pedestrian contributory negligence child standard of care comparative negligence legal doctrine jurisdictionsGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDReason
Pennsylvania comparative negligence statute 42 Pa.C.S. 7102 child contributory negligence minor pedestrian standard of careGoogle ↗
OBSERVEDReason

Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.

Query classes

Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.

ChatGPT real searches (2)
Short factOther / navigationalComparisonConsequenceReason100%DefinitionInstructionYes / no

Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 2 of 2 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.

Searches and sources

ChatGPT2 real searches · gpt-6
minor pedestrian contributory negligence child standard of care comparative negligence legal doctrine jurisdictions Google ↗
Pennsylvania comparative negligence statute 42 Pa.C.S. 7102 child contributory negligence minor pedestrian standard of care Google ↗

Queries

2 queries · click a column to sort
Query / typeSearchIntentQuery classRouting formatClusterFreq ↓Weight
minor pedestrian contributory negligence child standard of care comparative negligence legal doctrine jurisdictions
OBSERVED
Google ↗
AI Mode ↗
—Reason——1x
of 1
Pennsylvania comparative negligence statute 42 Pa.C.S. 7102 child contributory negligence minor pedestrian standard of care
OBSERVED
Google ↗
AI Mode ↗
—Reason——1x
of 1