Does the latest NIST SP 800-61 revision change how we should structure our playbook sections within our incident response plan template?
Download run
Fan-out diagram
The searches the AI actually ran for this prompt.
SEED QUERY
Does the latest NIST SP 800-61 revision change how we should structure our playbook sections within our incident response plan template?
1 real search · 1 real-search pass
NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 3 final publication latest incident response recommendations structure playbooks CSF 2.0Google ↗
OBSERVEDReason
Badge and edge weight = share of passes that produced the query. Hover a query for its intent and routing format.
Query classes
Google's semantic query class for every sub-query: what kind of answer each search is after, simulated vs real.
ChatGPT real searches (1)
Classes come from the query-classifier (a local Laya model). 1 of 1 calls are low-confidence (under 50%) — hover a query in the table to see its confidence.
Searches and sources
ChatGPT1 real searches · gpt-6
NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 3 final publication latest incident response recommendations structure playbooks CSF 2.0 Google ↗
- SP 800-61 Rev. 3, Incident Response Recommendations and Considerations for Cybersecurity Risk Management: A CSF 2.0 Community Profile · csrc.nist.gov
- SP 800-61 Rev. 2, Computer Security Incident Handling Guide · csrc.nist.gov
- Incident Response · csrc.nist.gov
- Incident Response Recommendations and Considerations for Cybersecurity Risk Management: A CSF 2.0 Community Profile · nvlpubs.nist.gov
- Incident Response Recommendations and Considerations for Cybersecurity Risk Management: A CSF 2.0 Community Profile · nvlpubs.nist.gov